Public development discussion
Use GitHub Issues to review network code, propose improvements and report gaps. It is not an official tokenholder vote.
Project issues
COMMUNITY & GOVERNANCE DEVELOPMENT
Forge the network.
Forge the network.
Shape its future.
ForgeCoin is building a community around its native FRG proof-of-work network. The project will determine governance procedures with input from native FRG miners and community contributors before introducing mFRG. Eligibility, proposal rules, authority, treasury controls, appeals and public reporting must be formally decided and published. No binding election or membership-verification system is active.
01 / PARTICIPATE
AVAILABLE
OPEN DESIGN
BEFORE mFRG
Review, contribute and discuss.
Governance framework
Help evaluate member eligibility, decision procedures, treasury oversight, conflict controls and a privacy-conscious community voice. No specific number of seats is preselected.
Design principlesTransparent decision procedures
Define the process for proposing changes, collecting community feedback, authorizing decisions and resolving disputes before future token development.
Review charter02 / GOVERNANCE
Rules before authority.
Governance remains an evolving FRG community proposal; the founder will select the framework after considering community advice. Procedures must be adopted before the future 50M mFRG token, 1:1 FRG-backed Solana bridge, DEX liquidity, staking and game payments are introduced. Rules should define participation, treasury and bridge signing, independent FRG proof-of-reserves and liability audits, staking reserve allocation, game treasury controls, conflicts, appeals, security and emergency powers. No rights or conversion service have been issued.
Open decisions
| Issue | Current status |
|---|---|
| Representatives or direct participation | Not selected |
| Voting/eligibility model | Not selected |
| Liquidity/staking treasury controls | Not approved |
| 50M treasury release policy | Rules not approved |
| Effective date of governance | Required before any mFRG introduction; not yet approved |
Proposed decision process
- Publish possible governance structures and eligibility policies
- Solicit miner, contributor, holder and public feedback
- Review treasury risk, key custody and operational safeguards
- Publish and ratify final rules through a process selected and disclosed in advance
- Operate, audit and publish decisions only after security and authorization checks
A project vote cannot automatically change native FRG consensus. Full node owners decide which network software to run.
03 / HISTORICAL DEMONSTRATIONS
Older election demos are not governance.
Legacy eligibility, registration and practice ballot software remain historical development examples. They do not implement the future governance framework or provide live elections, registration, voting, staking rewards or wallet custody.
04 / TRANSPARENCY
NETWORK
GOVERNANCE
FUTURE
Verify what is live.
The public website should distinguish audited, actual FRG mining records and Solana token balances from illustrative calculations, withdrawn research and future plans. Proposals do not imply issued rights, finalized prices or guaranteed yields.
Proof-of-work readiness
Independent consensus, node, wallet, pool and explorer acceptance gates remain necessary before public FRG mining.
Publish adopted decisions
Publish approved procedures and public decision records before future treasury or token programs.
Accountability reports
Future governance should publish authorizations, treasury balances/disbursements and security reviews without exposing private keys.